Editorial: Generative Artificial Intelligence, Large Language Models (LLMs), and Augmented Analytics vs. Big Data and Data Science

DEBATE: Beyond Big Data: Generative AI and LLMs as New Digital Technologies for the Analysis of Social Reality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54790/rccs.150

Keywords:

inteligencia artificial, inteligencia de negocios, ciencia de datos, macrodatos, modelos grandes de lenguaje, inteligencia generativa, analítica aumentada, Web of Science, mapas de conocimiento, publicaciones científicas, ciencias sociales

Abstract

This article comparatively examines the evolution of fields and technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), business intelligence (BI), data science (DS), big data (BD), large language models (LLMs), generative intelligence, and augmented analytics. Based on the “most cited” and “hot papers” in Web of Science (WoS), it analyzes co-occurrence networks of cited terms, visualizing a knowledge map that highlights key concepts and their connections. Over the past five years, there has been a relative decline in scientific publications on BI, BD, and DS, contrasted with the growing focus on LLMs —such as ChatGPT—generative artificial intelligence, and augmented analytics. This shift marks a significant transformation and opens up a range of opportunities and impacts for social sciences, as detailed in the articles included in the Debate section of Revista CENTRA de Ciencias Sociales.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Estrella Gualda Caballero, Universidad de Huelva

Catedrática de Sociología en la Universidad de Huelva, académica de número de la «Academia Iberoamericana de La Rábida» y directora del grupo de investigación «Estudios Sociales e Intervención Social» (ESEIS). En los últimos años ha prestado gran atención a la sociología computacional, ciencia de datos, big data, análisis de redes sociales, así como a cuestiones tales a las teorías de la conspiración, los discursos de odio en línea y la desinformación en relación con la COVID-19, y las personas inmigrantes, refugiadas y LGTBIQ+, encontrándose sus trabajos en revistas y editoriales de gran prestigio tales a Nature Communication, Nature Human Behaviour, Nature Scientific Data, IEEE Access, Array, Frontiers in Psychology, PNAS Nexus, Political Psychology, The American Sociologist, REIS, Empiria, Gazeta de Antropología, Redes, Springer, Routledge, Dykinson, entre otras.

References

Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187-6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. y Herrera, F. (2011). An approach to detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002

Codd, E. F. (1970). A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM 13, 6 (junio), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1145/362384.362685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/362384.362685

Cooper, G. (2023). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Gendler, M. A. (2026). Ciencias sociales y tecnologías digitales: un largo y complejo camino de enfoques e interrelaciones. Revista Centra de Ciencias Sociales, 5(1), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.54790/rccs.175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54790/rccs.175

Gómez Espino, J. M. (2026). Los LLM y la codificación en la investigación cua­litativa: avances y oportunidades para Social Verbatim como herramienta integral cualitativa. Revista Centra de Ciencias Sociales, 5(1), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.54790/rccs.176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54790/rccs.176

Gualda, E. (2025). Inteligencia artificial generativa, grandes modelos de lenguaje (LLMs) y analítica aumentada vs. big data y ciencia de datos: Nuevas avenidas para la investigación social — Dataset (XLSX), Script (R) y Visualización HTML (Plotly) - Materiales complementarios [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17298490

Harrer, S. (2023). Attention is not all you need: the complicated case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine. EBioMedicine, 90, 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512

Luhn, H. P. (1958). A Business Intelligence System. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2, 4, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.24.0314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.24.0314

Meskó, B. (2023). Prompt Engineering as an Important Emerging Skill for Medical Professionals: Tutorial. Journal of Medial Internet Research, 4, 25, e50638. https://doi.org/10.2196/50638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/50638

Mills, C. W. (1959). La imaginación sociológica. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Mügge, D. (2024). EU AI sovereignty: for whom, to what end, and to whose benefit? Journal of European Public Policy, 31(8), 2200-2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2318475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2318475

Murdoch, B. (2021). Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era. BMC Med Ethics, 22, 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3

Pinto-Coelho, L. (2023). How Artificial Intelligence Is Shaping Medical Imaging Technology: A Survey of Innovations and Applications. Bioengineering, 10(12), 1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10121435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10121435

Ryan, M. (2020). In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability. Sci Eng Ethics, 26, 2749-2767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y

Sætra, H. S. (2023). Generative AI: Here to stay, but for good? Technology in Society, 75, 102372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102372

Skinner, R. E. (2012). Building the Second Mind: 1956 and the Origins of Artificial Intelligence Computing. Smashwords. UC Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/88q1j6z3

Van Eck, N. J. y Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Varsha, P. S. (2023). How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems – A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3, 1, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100165

Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 21, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

Published

2026-01-09

How to Cite

Gualda Caballero, E. (2026). Editorial: Generative Artificial Intelligence, Large Language Models (LLMs), and Augmented Analytics vs. Big Data and Data Science: DEBATE: Beyond Big Data: Generative AI and LLMs as New Digital Technologies for the Analysis of Social Reality. CENTRA Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.54790/rccs.150

Issue

Section

Discussion