The rationality of conspiracy theories. An Approach from the Theories of Max Weber and Raymond Boudon

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54790/rccs.24

Keywords:

Conspiracy theories, Rational choice, Cognitive rationality, Max Weber, Raymond Boudon

Abstract

Conspiracy theories tend to be perceived as irrational ideological phenomena with the potential to produce adverse effects on those societies in which they are disseminated. Such perception, reinforced by the visibility of those historical examples in which they have legitimized the discrimination of minorities or even genocide, conditions their sociological analysis and constrains its explanatory potential with a presumption of irrationality. This paper defends, by contrast, an approach starting with a presumption of rationality, conceived in a comprehensive sense combining instrumental rationality and value rationality. Such a rational choice perspective allows for a fuller understanding of the phenomenon and, through it, potentially for a sounder basis for interventions seeking normative goals that the theory does not relinquish. The paper contrasts Pareto’s restricted conception of rationality with those of Weber and Boudon, to the extent that they apply to conspiracy theories, and examines the connections between these and religious beliefs according to Popper. Then it details the different rational approaches that the phenomenon allows for, and sketches a theoretical proposal attempting to conciliate the two main trends in sociological research on conspiracy theories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alejandro Romero Reche, University of Granada

Alejandro Romero Reche has a degree in Political Science and Sociology and a PhD in Sociology from the University of Granada. He has taught at the Universities of Malaga, Huelva and Granada, and has been a visiting professor at the Universities of Salzburg, Newcastle, Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Brighton, Siences Po Lyon and the Institut Catholique de Paris. In the field of conspiracy theories, he has participated in the edition of the Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories (2020) and has published various articles and book chapters, as well as the informative book Contubernios nacionales (Akal, 2021).

Türkay Salim Nefes, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales)

Salim Türkay Nefes (Istanbul, Turkey) holds a BA in Sociology and an MA in Political Science from the Middle East Technical University (METU) in Ankara, and a PhD in Sociology from the University of Kent. He has held postdoctoral positions at the University of Freiburg (2011) and at the University of Oxford (2012-2020). Since January 2020, he has been a Ramón y Cajal researcher at the Institute of Public Policies and Goods of the CSIC. Along with more than a dozen articles in impact scientific journals, he has published the book Online Anti-Semitism in Turkey (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

References

Aaronovitch, D. (2009). Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History. London: Jonathan Cape.

Albertson, B. y Kimberley, G. (2020). Conspiracy theories, election rigging, and support for democratic norms. Research & Politics, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020959859

Ben-Itto, H. (2020). The Lie That Wouldn’t Die: The Protocols of Elders of Zion. London: Vallentine Mitchell.

Bierwiaczonek, K., Gundersen, A. B. y Kunst, J. R. (2022). The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346

Birchall, C. (2006). Knowledge goes pop: From conspiracy theory to gossip. Oxford: Berg. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_390769

Boltanski, L. (2012). Énigmes et complots: une enquête à propos d’enquêtes. Paris: Gallimard. https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782070136292

Boudon, R. (1986). L’idéologie ou l’origine des idées reçues. Paris: Fayard.

Boudon, R. (1990). L’art de se persuader des idées douteuses, fragiles ou fausses. Paris: Fayard.

Boudon, R. (1996). The «cognitivist model»: a generalized «rational-choice model». Rationality and Society, 8, 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346396008002001

Boudon, R. (1998). Études sur les sociologues classiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Boudon, R. (2000). Études sur les sociologues classiques II. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Boudon, R (2001). The Origin of Values. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Boudon, R. (2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100213

Boudon, R. (2004). La sociología que realmente importa. Papers, 72, 215-226. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v72n0.1133

Boudon, R. (2008). How can axiological feelings be explained? International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 18(3), 349-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700802376412

Boudon, R. y Borricaud, F. (2004). Dictionnaire critique de la sociologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Bratich, J. (2008). Conspiracy panics: Political rationality and popular culture. State University of New York Press.

Brotherton, R. (2015). Suspicious minds: Why we believe conspiracy theories. New York: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472944528

Butter, M. (2020). The Nature of Conspiracy Theories. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-5_10

Byford, J. (2015). Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Chesterton, G. K. (1986). Collected Works Vol. I: Heretics, Orthodoxy, The Blatchford Controversies. San Francisco: Ignatius Press [ediciones originales: 1905, 1908 y 1904, respectivamente].

Chomsky, N. (2004). On historical amnesia, foreign policy and Iraq. American Amnesia, 17 de febrero.

Clarke, S. (2007). Conspiracy theories and the internet: Controlled demolition and arrested development. Episteme, 4(2), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.167

Coady, D. (2012). What to Believe Now. Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Cohn, N. (2010). El mito de la conspiración judía mundial. Los Protocolos de los Sabios de Sión. Madrid: Alianza.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. London: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.

Dentith, M. R. (2014). The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363169

Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S. y Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568

Dyrendal, A. (2020). Conspiracy theory and religion. En M. Butter y P. Knight, Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories (pp. 371-383). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-3_9

Enders, A. y Smallpage, S. (2019). Informational cues, partisan-motivated reasoning, and the manipulation of conspiracy beliefs. Political Communication, 36(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1493006

Enders, A., Smallpage, S. y Lupton, R. (2020). Are all ‘birthers’ conspiracy theorists? On the relationship between conspiratorial thinking and political orientations. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 849-866. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000837

Fenster, M. (1999). Conspiracy theories: Secrecy and power in American culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Freeman, D., Waite, F., Rosebrock, L., Petit, A., Causier, C., East, A., et al. (2022). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine, 52(2), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890

Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 733-744. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630

Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

Harambam, J. y Aupers, S. (2021). From the unbelievable to the undeniable: Epistemological pluralism, or how conspiracy theorists legitimate their extraordinary truth claims. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(4), 990-1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549419886045

Hofstadter, R. (1965). The paranoid style in American politics and other essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Husting, G. y Orr, M. (2007). Dangerous machinery: “Conspiracy theorist” as a transpersonal strategy of exclusion. Symbolic Interaction, 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2007.30.2.127

Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber’s types of rationality: cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1145-1179. https://doi.org/10.1086/227128

Knight, P. (2000). Conspiracy culture: From the Kennedy assassination to the X-Files. London: Routledge.

Leveaux, S., Nera, K., Fagnoni, P. y Klein, P. P. L. E. (2022). Defining and Explaining Conspiracy Theories: Comparing the Lay Representations of Conspiracy Believers and Non-Believers. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9p2ca

Locke, S. (2009). Conspiracy culture, blame culture, and rationalisation. Sociological Review, 57, 567-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01862.x

Mancosu, M., Vassallo, S. y Vezzoni, C. (2017). Believing in conspiracy theories: evidence from an exploratory analysis of Italian survey data. South European Society and Politics, 22(3), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2017.1359894

Melley, T. (2000). Empire of Conspiracy: The Culture of Paranoia in Postwar America. London: Cornell University Press.

Miller, J., Saunders, K. y Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: the moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824-844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234

Nefes, T. S. (2013). Political parties’ perceptions and uses of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories in Turkey. Sociological Review, 61, 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12016

Nefes, T. S. (2014). Rationale of conspiracy theorizing: Who shot the president Chen Shui-bian? Rationality and Society, 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463113519069

Nefes, T. S. y Romero Reche, A. (2020). Sociology, Social Theory and Conspiracy Theory. En M. Butter y P. Knight, Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories (pp. 94-107). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-1_7

Nyhan, B. y Zeitzoff, T. (2018). Conspiracy and misperception belief in the Middle East and North Africa. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1400-1404. https://doi.org/10.1086/698663

Pareto, V. (1964 [1916]). Trattato di sociologia generale. Milan: Edizioni di Comunità.

Pasek, J., Stark, T., Krosnick, J. y Tompson, T. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-Black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009

Pipes, D. (1997). Conspiracy: How the paranoid style flourishes and where it comes from. New York: Free Press.

Popper, K. R. (1984). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume II: The High Tide of Prophecy. Hegel, Marx and the Aftermath. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Popper, K. R. (2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Preston, P. (2021). Arquitectos del terror. Franco y los artífices del odio. Barcelona: Debate.

Prooijen, J. W. y Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: the influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922

Pummerer, L., Böhm, R., Lilleholt, L., Winter, K., Zettler, I. y Sassenberg, K. (2022). Conspiracy theories and their societal effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211000217

Reichstadt, R. (2019). L’opium des imbéciles. Essai sur la question complotiste. Paris: Bernard Grasset.

Rogin, M. (1987). Ronald Reagan the Movie and Other Episodes of Political Demonology. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520908994

Rothschild, M. (2021). The Storm is Upon Us. How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything. London: Melville House.

Southworth, H. R. (2002). Conspiracy and the Spanish Civil War. The Brainwashing of Francisco Franco. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465837

Sutton, R. y Douglas, K. (2022). Rabbit Hole Syndrome: Inadvertent, accelerating and entrenched commitment to conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology (en prensa). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101462

Swami, V. y Furnham, A. (2012). Examining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of Amelia Earhart. Journal of General Psychology, 139, 244- 259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.697932

Swami, V., Pietschnig, J., Ulrich, S. T. et al. (2013). Lunar lies: the impact of informational framing and individual differences in shaping conspiracist beliefs about the moon landings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2873

Ullah, I., Khan, K. S., Tahir, M. J., Ahmed, A. y Harapan, H. (2021). Myths and conspiracy theories on vaccines and COVID-19: Potential effect on global vaccine refusals. Vacunas, 22(2), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacun.2021.01.001

Uscinski, J. y Parent, J. (2014). American conspiracy theories. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001

Uscinski, J., Klofstad, C. y Atkinson, M. (2016). What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915621621

Van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F. y Jost, J. H. (2021). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 23-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12681

Weber, M. (1993 [1922]). Economía y sociedad. Esbozo de sociología comprensiva. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Weber, M. (2001 [1905]). La ética protestante y el «espíritu» del capitalismo. Madrid: Alianza.

Weber, M. (2009). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge.

Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M. y Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786

Woods, P. (2001). Values-intuitive rational action: the dynamic relationship of instrumental rationality and values insights as a form of social action. The British Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 687-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120084535

Published

2022-10-21

How to Cite

Romero Reche, A., & Salim Nefes, T. . (2022). The rationality of conspiracy theories. An Approach from the Theories of Max Weber and Raymond Boudon. CENTRA Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.54790/rccs.24

Issue

Section

Artículos